(PC) Rojas et al v. Brown et al

Filing 92

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/17/2021. Discovery Deadlines: Non-Expert 9/30/2022; Expert 12/16/2022. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 4/15/2022 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 1/10/2023; Hearing by 2/7/2023. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 2/21/2023; Hearing by 3/21/2023. Settlement Conference set for 2/7/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. Pretrial Conference set for 7/24/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

STACY ROJAS, et al.,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

v
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1: 17-CV-01514 - DAD - JLT
SCHEDULING ORDER1 (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16)
Pleading Amendment Deadline: 3/1/2022
Discovery Deadlines:
Initial Disclosures: 12/1/2021
Non-Expert: 9/30/2022
Expert: 12/16/2022
Mid-Discovery Status Conference:
4/15/2022 at 8:30 a.m.

16
17

Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 1/10/2023
Hearing: 2/7/2023

18
19

Dispositive Motion Deadlines:
Filing: 2/21/2023
Hearing: 3/21/2023

20
21
22

Settlement Conference:
2/7/2023 at 10:00 a.m.
510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA

23
24

Pre-Trial Conference:
7/24/2023 at 1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 5

25
26
27
28

1

The Court found the information provided in the Joint Scheduling Report was sufficient to schedule the
matter without a hearing, and the conference with the parties was vacated on November 12, 2021. (Docs. 90, 91.)

1

1

I.

Magistrate Judge Consent:

2

Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing

3

Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the adopted policy of the Fresno Division of the

4

Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set before a

5

District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older civil case

6

set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset.
The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that

7
8

of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize

9

criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge

10

may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of

11

Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States

12

Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.
The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United

13
14

States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the

15

Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance

16

notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern

17

District of California.
Therefore, the parties are directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to

18
19

conduct all further proceedings, including trial. Within 10 days of the date of this order, the parties

20

SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating

21

whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge.

22

II.

Pleading Amendment Deadline
Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or

23
24

motion to amend, no later than March 1, 2022. Any motion to amend the pleadings shall be heard by

25

the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States District Court Judge.

26

III.

27
28

Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date
The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

on or before December 1, 2021.
2

1

The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before

2

September 30, 2022, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before December 16, 2022.
The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses2, in writing, on or before October 14,

3
4

2022, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before November 15, 2022. The written designation of

5

retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B),

6

and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in

7

compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered

8

through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts

9
10

and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions

11

included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may

12

include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony.
The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement

13
14

disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced.
The Court sets a mid-discovery status conference on April 15, 2022 at 8:30 a.m. before Judge

15
16

Thurston, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-

17

discovery status conference report one week before the conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the

18

status report via e-mail to [e-mail]. The joint statement SHALL outline the

19

discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be completed as well as any impediments to

20

completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this order. Counsel SHALL discuss

21

settlement and certify that they have done so. Counsel may appear via teleconference by dialing (888)

22

557-8511 and entering Access Code 1652736, provided the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy

23

Clerk receives a written notice of the intent to appear telephonically no later than five court days before

24

the noticed hearing date.

25

IV.

26

Pre-Trial Motion Schedule
All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later

27
28

2

In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health
evaluation, the examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s
report fully details the expert’s opinions in this regard.

3

1

than January 10, 20233 and heard on or before February 7, 2023. Discovery motions are heard before

2

Judge Thurston at the United States Courthouse in Bakersfield, California. For these hearings, counsel

3

may appear via teleconference by dialing [phone] and entering Access Code 1652736, provided

4

the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Deputy Clerk receives a written notice of the intent to appear

5

telephonically no later than five court days before the noticed hearing date. All other non-dispositive

6

hearings SHALL be set before Judge Drozd.
No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it

7
8

is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written

9

discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. A party

10

with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve by

11

agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party promptly

12

shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the

13

obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To schedule

14

this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall, at

15

[phone] or via email at [e-mail]. At least three days before the conference,

16

counsel SHALL file informal letter briefs detailing their positions. The briefs may not exceed 7 pages,

17

excluding exhibits. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251 with respect to discovery disputes or

18

the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped from the Court’s calendar.

19

All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than February 21, 2023, and heard no

20

later than March 22, 2023 in Courtroom 5 at 9:30 a.m. before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United

21

States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56

22

and Local Rules 230 and 260.

23

V.

Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication

24

At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary

25

adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues

26

to be raised in the motion.

27
28

3

Non-dispositive motions related to non-expert discovery SHALL be filed within a reasonable time of
discovery of the dispute, but in no event later than 30 days after the expiration of the non-expert discovery
deadline.

4

1

The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a

2

question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole

3

or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the

4

issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the

5

expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts.
The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed

6
7

statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of

8

undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be

9

deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint

10

statement of undisputed facts.
In the notice of motion, the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and

11
12

conferred as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer.

13

Failure to comply may result in the motion being stricken.

14

VI.

Pre-Trial Conference Date

15

July 24, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5 before Judge Drozd.

16

The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2).

17

The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format,

18

directly to Judge Drozd's chambers, by email at [e-mail].
Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the

19
20

Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference.

21

The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the

22

Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the

23

Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire.

24

VII.

25

Settlement Conference
A settlement conference is scheduled for February 7, 2023 at 10:00 a.m., before Magistrate

26

Judge Sheila K. Oberto, located at the Robert E. Coyle Courthouse located at 2500 Tulare Street,

27

Fresno, California.

28

Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case
5

1

shall appear at the settlement conference with the parties and the person or persons having full

2

authority to negotiate and settle the case on any reasonable terms4 discussed at the conference.

3

Each of the participants SHALL participate in good faith and in the spirit of compromise. If they

4

cannot do so, they SHALL alert the Court and their opponent, so that the Court can determine

5

whether the conference should be continued or vacated.

6

Consideration of settlement is a serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement

7

conference. Set forth below are the procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in

8

conducting the conference.

9

At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via

10

fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful5 settlement demand which includes a

11

brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the

12

settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond, via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or

13

with a meaningful counteroffer which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is

14

appropriate. The parties SHALL continue to exchange counteroffers until it is no longer

15

productive.

16

If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their

17

Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents shall

18

not be filed on the court docket.
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT

19
20

At least five court days before the settlement conference, the parties shall submit, directly to

21

Judge Oberto’s chambers by e-mail to [e-mail], a Confidential Settlement

22

Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on

23
24
25
26
27
28

4

Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement
agreements are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like
may be represented by a person whose recommendations about settlement are relied upon by the ultimate
decision makers.
5
“Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the
offering party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to
the other party. If, however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other
party will not accept, this should trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties
should confer about continuing or vacating the settlement conference via stipulation.

6

1

any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference

2

Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the

3

Settlement Conference indicated prominently thereon.

4

The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following:

5

A.

A brief statement of the facts of the case.

6

B.

A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which

7

the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of prevailing on

8

the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute.

9

C.

A summary of the proceedings to date.

10

D.

An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial.

11

E.

The relief sought.

12

F.

The party’s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history
of past settlement discussions, offers and demands.

13
14

XIII. Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other

15

Techniques to Shorten Trial

16

Not applicable at this time.

17

IX.

There are no pending related matters.

18
19

Related Matters Pending

X.

Compliance with Federal Procedure
All counsel SHALL familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the

20
21

Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any amendments

22

thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently handle its

23

increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal Rules of Civil

24

Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California.

25

XI.

26

Effect of this Order
The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most

27

suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the

28

parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered
7

1

to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by

2

subsequent status conference.

3

The dates set in this order are firm and will not be modified absent a showing of good

4

cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations extending the deadlines

5

contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by affidavits or

6

declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause for granting

7

the relief requested.

8

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 17, 2021

_ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8