Venable v. Patel
Filing
61
ORDER Continuing Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/03/2021. Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing set for 12/13/2021 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.(Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ELVIS VENABLE,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
PATEL,
Defendant.
16
Case No. 1:17-cv-01519-BAM (PC)
ORDER CONTINUING TELEPHONIC
TRIAL CONFIRMATION HEARING
Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing:
Date: December 13, 2021
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Judge: Barbara A. McAuliffe
17
18
Due to various scheduling conflicts, including an upcoming jury trial before the
19
undersigned, the Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing currently scheduled for December 1,
20
2021, at 9:00 a.m. before the undersigned will be continued.
21
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. The Telephonic Trial Confirmation Hearing is CONTINUED from December 1, 2021, at
23
9:00 a.m. to December 13, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8. The parties shall appear
24
telephonically (via Zoom);
25
2. Defense counsel shall contact Courtroom Deputy, Esther Valdez, at (559) 499-5788 or
26
evaldez@caed.uscourts.gov for the Zoom dial-in information for all parties. Defense
27
counsel is required to arrange for Plaintiff’s participation by contacting the
28
Litigation Coordinator at the institution where Plaintiff is housed to provide the
1
1
necessary dial-in information and confirm whether the institution is able to produce
2
Plaintiff for a telephonic appearance at the scheduled date and time; and
3
3. Any necessary transportation writ will be issued in due course.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
November 3, 2021
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?