Hoskins v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

ORDER GRANTING THIRD STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S OPENING BRIEF. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The Commissioner shall file a responsive brief on or before November 8, 2018; and Plaintiff may file a reply brief on or before November 26, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/9/2018. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEANETTE HOSKINS, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING THIRD STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S OPENING BRIEF v. 13 14 Case No. 1:17-cv-01520-SAB COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (ECF No. 20) 15 Defendant. 16 17 On October 8, 2018, the parties filed a third stipulated request that an extension of time 18 be granted to allow Defendant to file a response to Plaintiff’s opening brief. (ECF No. 20.) The 19 Court GRANTS the parties’ request. However, the parties are advised that due to the impact of 20 social security cases on the Court’s docket and the Court’s desire to have cases decided in an 21 expedient manner, requests for modification of the briefing scheduling will not routinely be 22 granted and will only be granted upon a showing of good cause. Further, requests to modify the 23 briefing schedule that are made on the eve of a deadline will be looked upon with disfavor and 24 may be denied absent good cause for the delay in seeking an extension. 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Commissioner shall file a responsive brief on or before November 8, 2018; and 3 2. 4 Plaintiff may file a reply brief on or before November 26, 2018. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: October 9, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?