Robinson v. Davey et al
Filing
86
ORDER ADOPTING 85 Findings and Recommendations; ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, due to Plaintiff's failure to prosecute and to keep the Court apprised of his current mailing address as required, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/1/2021. CASE CLOSED(Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY L. ROBINSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 17-cv-01524-DAD-GSA (PC)
v.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
A. PETERSON, et al.,
(Doc. No. 85)
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff Anthony L. Robinson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
18
in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United
19
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On October 29, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and
20
21
recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, due to
22
plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. (Doc. No. 85.) The findings and recommendations recommended
23
dismissal in part because the court’s most recently issued order was returned by the United States
24
Postal Service to the court marked as undeliverable on August 18, 2021 due to plaintiff’s apparent
25
change of address. The pending findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff by mail
26
at his address of record and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within
27
fourteen (14) days from the date of service. (Id.) However, on November 8, 2021, the United
28
/////
1
1
States Postal Service returned those findings and recommendations to the court as likewise
2
undeliverable.
3
4
Plaintiff was required by Local Rule 183 to file a notice of change of address with this
court within sixty-three (63) days of the first undeliverable notice and has not done so.
5
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a
6
de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings
7
and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
8
Accordingly,
9
1.
10
11
adopted in full;
2.
12
13
14
15
16
The findings and recommendations issued on October 29, 2021 (Doc. No. 85) are
This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute
and to keep the court apprised of his current mailing address as required; and
3.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 1, 2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?