Acosta v. Damian, et al.

Filing 23

Plaintiff's 22 Request to continue mandatory scheduling conference; Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/2/2018. The Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for May 8, 2018, shall be continued to July 17, 2018, at 10:15 A.M. before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Rosales, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Zachary M. Best, SBN 166035 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone: (408) 298-2000 Facsimile: (408) 298-6046 Email: service@mission.legal Attorney for Plaintiff, Jose Acosta 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE ACOSTA, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, vs. JUAN DAMIAN dba EL PARIAN GROCERY MART, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 1:17-cv-1533-DAD-SKO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER (Doc. 22) Current MSC Date: Time: Courtroom: May 8, 2018 10:30 a.m. 7 Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto 19 20 Plaintiff Jose Acosta (“Plaintiff”), by and through his attorneys of record, hereby 21 requests a continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently scheduled in this 22 matter for May 8, 2018 at 10:30 a.m. for the reasons set forth below. 23 1. Plaintiff has reached a settlement with defendant Juan Damian dba El Parian 24 Grocery Mart (“Damian”), and Damian was dismissed from the action on March 23, 2018 25 (Dkt. 18). 26 2. 27 Clerk’s defaults were entered against defendants Ali Sadik (“Sadik”) and John Kojigian, Jr. (“Kojigian”) on March 16, 2018 (Dkt. 14 and 15). 28 PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER Page 1 1 3. Plaintiff’s counsel has been in contact with counsel for Kojigian, and Plaintiff 2 and Kojigian stipulated to set aside Kojigian’s default on March 22, 2018 (Dkt. 17). Pursuant 3 to the Order granting that stipulation, Kojigian’s responsive pleading was to be filed by April 4 14, 2018 (Dkt. 19). 5 4. While Kojigian has not timely filed a responsive pleading, Plaintiff and 6 Kojigian are discussing resolution of Plaintiff’s claims against Kojigian and Plaintiff believes 7 that a resolution is imminent. For that reason, Plaintiff has not again requested entry of 8 Kojigian’s default. 9 10 5. Once Plaintiff’s claims against Kojigian have been resolved, Plaintiff will proceed with a motion for default judgment against Sadik on his remaining claims. 11 For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Mandatory 12 Scheduling Conference currently set for May 8, 2018 be continued to a date after June 20, 13 2018, to be vacated if Plaintiff files a motion for default judgment in the intervening time. 14 15 Dated: May 1, 2018 MISSION LAW FIRM, A.P.C. 16 /s/ Zachary M. Best Zachary M. Best Attorney for Plaintiff, Jose Acosta 17 18 19 20 ORDER 21 Upon request by Plaintiff (Doc. 22) and good cause appearing, 22 The Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for May 8, 2018, shall be continued 23 to July 17, 2018, at 10:15 A.M. before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto in Courtroom 7 of 24 the above-entitled Court. A Joint Scheduling Report shall be filed one week prior to the 25 Conference. 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER Page 2 1 2 Dated: May 2, 2018 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER Page 3 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?