Benanti v. Matevousian

Filing 49

ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to File a Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel within Five Days from the Date of Service of this Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/10/2019. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 MICHAEL BENANTI, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 v. MATEVOUSIAN, 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01556-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL WITHIN FIVE DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS ORDER [ECF No. 48] Plaintiff Michael Benanti is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 16 On March 14, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel. Defendants did not file a response. 17 Local Rule 230(l). However, based on a review of Plaintiff’s motion, it is not entirely clear whether 18 Plaintiff is seeking an order compelling a further response from Defendants. That said, the Court finds 19 that a response from Defendants is necessary in order to fully adjudicate Plaintiff’s motion. 20 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within five (5) days from the date of service of this order, 21 Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff’s motion to compel, filed March 14, 2019. (ECF No. 48.) 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 10, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?