Burghardt-Cobb v. Inch
Filing
67
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE; Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/27/2021. Pre-Settlement Conference set for 6/15/2021 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto, Settlement Conference set for 6/24/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto, Pretrial Conference set for 8/9/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Kusamura, W)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
KATHLEEN BURGHARDT-COBB,
Plaintiff,
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE AND PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE
9
v.
10
11
Case No. 1:17-cv-01563-DAD-SKO
MARK S. INCH,
Defendant.
12
_____________________________________/
13
14
15
16
17
18
The Court held a telephonic conference on April 27, 2021. Kevin Little, Esq., appeared on
behalf of Plaintiff. Benjamin Hall, Esq., appeared behalf of Defendant. As discussed with the
parties, the Court hereby SETS a Settlement Conference for June 24, 2021, at 10:00 A.M.
before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto.
The Court further SETS the Pretrial Conference for August 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. before
19
District Judge Dale A. Drozd.
20
Consideration of settlement is a serious matter that requires thorough preparation prior to
21
the settlement conference. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
22
23
1.
Pre-settlement Conference Exchange of Demand and Offer
24
As discussed with the parties during the telephonic pre-settlement conference, a settlement
25
conference is more likely to be productive if, before the conference, the parties exchange written
26
settlement proposals. Accordingly, at least 5 weeks prior to the settlement conference, counsel for
27
plaintiff shall submit an updated written itemization of damages and settlement demand to defense
28
counsel with a brief summary of the legal and factual basis supporting the demand. No later than
1
4 weeks prior to the settlement conference, defense counsel shall submit a written offer to counsel
2
for plaintiff with a brief summary of the legal and factual basis supporting the offer.
3
The parties shall continue to meet and confer thereafter to attempt to compromise
4
regarding their respective positions, so as to assist with ensuring that the settlement conference
5
will be productive.
6
2.
7
The parties are to send Confidential Settlement Conference Statements (Settlement
8
Statement) to the following email address: SKOorders@caed.uscourts.gov, to arrive no later than
9
fourteen (14) days before the conference.
Submission and Content of Confidential Settlement Conference Statements
Each statement shall be clearly marked
10
“CONFIDENTIAL” with the date and time of the mandatory settlement conference indicated
11
prominently.
12
Conference Statement (See L.R. 270 (d)).
Each party shall also file a Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement
13
If the Settlement Conference is continued for any reason, each party must submit a new
14
Settlement Statement that is complete in itself, without reference to any prior Settlement
15
Statements.
16
17
Each Settlement Statement shall include the following:
a.
18
evaluation of the parties’ likelihood of prevailing on the claims and
19
20
21
defenses, and a description of the major issues in dispute.
b.
A summary of the proceedings to date.
c.
An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery,
22
23
24
25
26
27
A brief summary of the core facts, allegations, and defenses, a forthright
pretrial, and trial.
d.
The nature of the relief sought.
e.
An outline of past settlement efforts including information regarding the
"Pre-settlement Conference Exchange of Demand and Offer" required
above—including the itemization of damages—and a history of past
settlement discussions, offers, and demands.
28
2
1
f.
2
A statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the Settlement
Conference.
3
3.
4
The attorneys who will try the case and parties with full and complete settlement authority
Attendance of Trial Counsel and Parties Required
5
are required to personally attend the conference.1
6
representative of the insurer who is authorized to negotiate, and who has full authority to negotiate
7
and settle the case. An uninsured corporate party shall appear by a representative authorized to
8
negotiate, and who has full authority to negotiate and settle the case. It is difficult for a party who
9
is not present to appreciate the process and the reasons that may justify a change in one’s
10
perspective toward settlement. Accordingly, having a client with authority available by telephone
11
is not an acceptable alternative, except under the most extenuating circumstances.2
An insured party shall appear by a
12
In light of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and the resulting courthouse restrictions,
13
see General Orders Nos. 612–618, the Court will revisit the in-person requirement closer to the
14
date of the settlement conference and reserves the right to modify the requirement depending upon
15
the courthouse restrictions, if any, in place as of June 24, 2021. The parties are advised that while
16
the courthouse restrictions pursuant to General Order No. 618 are in place, Zoom videoconference
17
settlement conferences are available. At the June 15, 2021, Pre-Settlement Conference, (see
18
paragraph 6 below), the parties should be prepared to discuss the method of conducting the
19
20
21
settlement conference and whether the settlement conference should proceed on June 24, 2021. If
the parties opt to conduct the settlement conference by Zoom videoconference, the Court will
provide the call-in information closer to the time of the settlement conference.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The Court expects both the lawyers and the party representatives to be fully prepared to
participate. The Court encourages all parties to keep an open mind in order to reassess their
previous positions and to discover creative means for resolving the dispute.
///
1
Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements are
subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by
a person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved
in the process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements.
2
Out of town or out of state travel and the purchase of an airplane ticket are not extenuating circumstances.
3
1
4.
2
The parties shall be prepared to discuss the following at the settlement conference:
3
Issues to Be Discussed
a.
Goals in the litigation and problems they would like to address in the
settlement conference and understanding of the opposing side’s goals.
4
5
b.
The issues (in and outside the lawsuit) that need to be resolved.
6
c.
The strengths and weaknesses of their case.
7
d.
Their understanding of the opposing side’s view of the case.
8
e.
Their points of agreement and disagreement (factual and legal).
9
f.
Any financial, emotional, and/or legal impediments to settlement.
10
g.
Whether settlement or further litigation better enables the accomplishment
11
of their respective goals.
12
h.
Any possibilities for a creative resolution of the dispute.
13
5.
14
The parties are expected to address each other with courtesy and respect and are
15
encouraged to be frank and open in their discussions. Statements made by any party during the
16
settlement conference are not to be used in discovery and will not be admissible at trial.
Statements Inadmissible
17
6.
18
Prior to the Settlement Conference, Magistrate Judge Oberto will hold a brief, telephonic
19
20
Pre-Settlement Telephonic Conference
discussion on June 15, 2021, at 4:00 PM (dial-in number: 1-888-557-8511; passcode:
6208204#). Only attorneys and unrepresented parties are required to participate in the conference.
21
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 27, 2021
/s/
Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
28
4
.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?