Boulas v. United States Postal Service et al
Filing
4
ORDER Continuing Mandatory Scheduling Conference and Requiring Plaintiff to File Notice of Status of Service signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 02/12/2018. Scheduling Conference set for 4/17/2018 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Joint Scheduling Report due 7-Days Prior to the Scheduling Conference. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MATTHEW BOULAS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
Case No. 1:17 -cv-01588-LJO-SAB
ORDER CONTINUING MANDATORY
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND
REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE NOTICE
OF STATUS OF SERVICE
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et al.,
FIVE DAY DEADLINE
Defendants.
15
16
17
Plaintiff Matthew Boulas filed this action on November 29, 2017. (ECF No. 1.) On
18 November 30, 2017, the summonses and scheduling order issued. (ECF Nos. 2, 3.) The
19 scheduling order provides that Plaintiff is to serve the complaint in compliance with Rule 4 of
20 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to promptly file proofs of service. (ECF No. 3 at 1-2.)
21 The scheduling conference in this action is currently set for February 20, 2018, and as of today,
22 no proof of service has been filed and the defendants have not appeared in this action.
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1.
informing the Court of the status of service in this action;
25
26
2.
The scheduling conference set for February 20, 2018, is CONTINUED to April
17, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 9; and
27
28
Within five days of the date of entry of this order, Plaintiff shall file a notice
3.
The parties shall file a joint scheduling report seven (7) days prior to the
1
scheduling conference.
1
2
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4 Dated:
February 12, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?