Thomas v. Matevousian, et al.

Filing 15

ORDER adopting 9 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 7 Motion for preliminary injunctive relief signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/9/2018. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 REGINALD R. THOMAS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 MATEVOUSIAN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 1:17-cv-1592-AWI-GSA (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 9.) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (ECF No. 7.) 16 17 18 Reginald R. Thomas (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 20 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 21 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 On March 19, 2018, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that 23 Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. (ECF No. 9.) On May 4, 2018, 24 Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 13.) 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this 26 court has reviewed this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Plaintiff’s 27 objections, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 28 proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 4 5 The findings and recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on March 19, 2018, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on March 8, 2018, is DENIED. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 9, 2018 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?