Bradford v. Sherman, et al.

Filing 51

ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Close Case re 49 signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/22/2019. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DWIGHT LARRY BRADFORD,

12
13
14
15

1:17-cv-01601-LJO-SKO

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
COURT TO CLOSE CASE

SHERMAN, et al.,
(Doc. 49)
Defendants.

16
17
18

On October 18, 2019, Plaintiff Dwight Larry Bradford filed the parties’ stipulation that

19

this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

20

41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Doc. 49.) Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides that a “plaintiff may dismiss an action

21

without a court order by filing … a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have

22

appeared.” Once a voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is properly filed, no order of the court

23

is necessary to effectuate dismissal; the dismissal is effective automatically. Commercial Space

24

Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999).

25

Because Plaintiff has filed a stipulation for dismissal of this case with prejudice under

26

Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), signed by all parties, this case has terminated. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

27

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court close this case.

28

1
2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 22, 2019

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

.