Bradford v. Sherman, et al.
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/3/2020 GRANTING plaintiff's attorney's Request for Authority to Incur Costs by appointed pro bono counsel Caroline M. Lutz. (Crouch, J)
Print Form
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IDwight Larry Bradford,
Plaintiff( s)
No.11:17-cv-1601-LJO-SKO
vs.
lsherman, et al.,
Defendants.
REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY TO INCUR
COSTS (APPOINTED COUNSEL) AND
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
- - - - - - - - - - -I
REQUEST OF PRO BONO FOR PRE-APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES
Complete this form and return it to the court (with two copies) for approval prior to incurring the
cost for which reimbursement is requested.
I, lcaroline M. Lutz
, attorney for plaintiff(s), declare as follows:
===--=-=-....:....::.i:.:..:===-===C>.=..l'-'i"'-'n'-t;:.:;.h=-=is action on !April 23, 2019
' by the
Honorable Sheila K. Oberto
, United States District Judge/Magistrate Judge.
I believe that the following course of action is reasonably necessary to the prosecution of this
action:
1. Reimbursement for Mileage in the amount of $180.96 on 07/24/2019: Plaintiffs counsel traveled to Mule
Creek State Prison for an in-person meeting with Mr. Bradford. Pursuant to General Order 558, section 4.A.S)i.,
reimbursement for travel in a privately-owned vehicle may be allowed at the federal rate.
2. Reimbursement for Mileage in the amount of $12.06 on 10/17/2019: Plaintiffs counsel traveled to the U.S.
Eastern District Court (Fresno) to participate in a court-ordered settlement conference. Pursuant to General
Order 558, section 4.A.5)i., reimbursement for travel in a privately-owned vehicle may be allowed at the federal
~
a
Counsel seeking reimbursement must support all claimed expenses by submitting invoices, receipts or similar
documentation. Without such documentation, counsel will not be reimbursed.
I have made reasonable inquiry and believe that the cost of this course of action will not exceed
the amount of$ j193.02
I therefore request that this court authorize the expenditure in an amount not to exceed that stated
above for the completion of this contemplated course of action.
REQUEST OF PRO BONO FOR PRE-APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES - PAGE 2
Case Number: j1:17-cv-1601-UO-SKO
The following payments of costs have been heretofore approved in this matter:
Amount
Approved
Amount
Paid
Purpose
I
INo previous requests have been submitted.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signed this j13th
day of
The above expenditure is
loecember
/
, 20
F ,at
Approved
jFresno
, California.
Denied
Or,
- - - -Good cause appearing therefore, this matter is set for discovery conference, pursuant
to rule - - -, on
Number
_________
___,
at
____
_,
.M. in Courtroom
- --
United States District Judge/Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?