Cummins v. Borders
Filing
6
ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/07/2017. New Case Number 2:17-cv-2575 EFB. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
1:17-cv-01624-SAB (HC)
JAMES CUMMINS,
Petitioner,
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
v.
DEAN BORDERS,
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a habeas corpus action pursuant to
18
28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with multiple motions and a request to proceed in forma pauperis
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
20
Petitioner is challenging a conviction from Shasta County, which is part of the
21
Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
22
Therefore, the petition should have been filed in the Sacramento Division. Pursuant to Local Rule
23
120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper court may, on the court’s own
24
motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the
25
Sacramento Division.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
28
California sitting in Sacramento;
1
1
2
2. All future filings shall reference the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall
be filed at:
3
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
501 “I” Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento, CA 95814
4
5
3. This court has not ruled on Petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis or any
6
7
other pending motions.
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 7, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?