Valencia v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 24

STIPULATION and ORDER for the Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) (28 U.S.C. 2412(d)) signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/22/2019. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION 7 8 9 HORTENCIA T. VALENCIA, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 Case No. 1:17-cv-01662-GSA STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (EAJA) (28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)) 1 13 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant. 15 TO THE HONORABLE GARY S. AUSTIN, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT: The Parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the Court’s approval, 18 19 stipulate that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in the amount of SIX THOUSAND, 20 TWO HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS and 00/100 ($6,250.00) under the Equal Access 21 to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount represents compensation for 22 all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil 23 action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). 24 25 1 Andrew Saul is now the Commissioner of Social Security and is automatically substituted as a party 26 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). See also section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 USC 405(g) 27 (action survives regardless of any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security). 28 1 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will 2 consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to 3 Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability 4 to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset 5 allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After 6 the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are 7 subject to any offset. 8 Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury 9 determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause 10 the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to counsel, pursuant to the 11 assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s 12 counsel, Jonathan O. Peña. 13 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for 14 15 EAJA fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant 16 under the EAJA. Payment of SIX THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS 17 and 00/100 ($6,250.00) in EAJA attorney fees shall constitute a complete release from, 18 and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s attorney, Jonathan O. Peña, 19 may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. 20 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s attorney to seek Social 21 Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause 22 provisions of the EAJA. 23 Respectfully submitted, 24 25 Dated: July 19, 2019 26 27 /s/ Jonathan O. Peña JONATHAN O. PEÑA Attorney for Plaintiff 28 -2- 1 Dated: July 19, 2019 2 3 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 4 By: /s/ Marcelo N. Illarmo* MARCELO N. ILLARMO Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant (*Permission to use electronic signature obtained via email on 7/16/19). 5 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: July 22, 2019 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?