Morales v. Davey et al
Filing
61
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should be Imposed for Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/26/19. Show Cause Response Due Within Seven Days. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSE LORENZO MORALES,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
v.
R. TORRES, et al.,
Case No.: 1:17-cv-01673-AWI-JLT (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD BE IMPOSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
7-DAY DEADLINE
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
On May 17, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel,
19
appointing Attorney Justin Palmer to represent Plaintiff in his civil rights action under 42 U.S.C.
20
§ 1983. (Doc. 53.) The Court requests voluntary assistance of Counsel in section 1983 cases only
21
in exceptional circumstances. Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997). On July 3,
22
2019, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 54.) To date, Plaintiff’s counsel
23
has not filed an opposition to Defendants’ motion on behalf of Plaintiff, nor has he requested an
24
extension of time.
25
“District courts have inherent power to control their dockets” and, in exercising that
26
power, may impose sanctions. Thompson v. Housing Auth., City of Los Angeles, 782 F.2d 829,
27
831 (9th Cir. 1986); see also Roadway Exp., Inc. v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752, 766-67 (1980) (holding
28
that monetary sanctions against counsel are within the inherent powers of courts). Accordingly,
1
2
3
4
5
6
Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause within 7 days of the date of service of this order why
sanctions should not be imposed on Plaintiff’s counsel for failure to prosecute this action.
Alternatively, within that same time, Plaintiff may file an opposition to Defendants’ motion for
summary judgment, or a motion or stipulation requesting an extension of time to file an
opposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated:
8
October 26, 2019
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?