Pina v. Kernan et al
Filing
25
ORDER adopting 19 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying Plaintiff's 14 Motion for injunctive relief signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/5/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PABLO P. PINA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 1:17-cv-01681-DAD-SAB (PC)
v.
SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,
15
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF
Defendants.
(Doc. Nos. 14, 19)
16
Plaintiff Pablo P. Pina is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this
17
18
civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States
19
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 3, 2018, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations
20
21
recommending that plaintiff’s motion for an order directing prison officials to provide him access
22
to his legal materials be denied. (Doc. No. 19.) The findings and recommendations were served
23
on plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days.
24
Plaintiff did not file objections and the time for doing so has expired.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a
25
26
de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings
27
and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations issued on July 3, 2018 (Doc. No. 19) are
3
adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff’s motion for a court order directing prison officials to produce his legal
4
5
6
7
8
materials (Doc. No. 14) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 5, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?