Pina v. Kernan et al

Filing 25

ORDER adopting 19 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying Plaintiff's 14 Motion for injunctive relief signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/5/2018. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PABLO P. PINA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 1:17-cv-01681-DAD-SAB (PC) v. SCOTT KERNAN, et al., 15 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 14, 19) 16 Plaintiff Pablo P. Pina is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 17 18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 3, 2018, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 20 21 recommending that plaintiff’s motion for an order directing prison officials to provide him access 22 to his legal materials be denied. (Doc. No. 19.) The findings and recommendations were served 23 on plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days. 24 Plaintiff did not file objections and the time for doing so has expired. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a 25 26 de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings 27 and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations issued on July 3, 2018 (Doc. No. 19) are 3 adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a court order directing prison officials to produce his legal 4 5 6 7 8 materials (Doc. No. 14) is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 5, 2018 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?