Pina v. Kernan et al
Filing
52
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to CLOSE Action Pursuant to Parties' Stipulation for Voluntary Dismissal signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/21/2020. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PABLO P. PINA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
CLOSE ACTION PURSUANT TO PARTIES’
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
[ECF No. 51]
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On May 20, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to
19
20
Case No.: 1:17-cv-01681-DAD-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff Pablo P. Pina is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 51.)
21
Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides in pertinent part that, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without
22
a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. A voluntary
23
stipulation to dismiss an action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) automatically terminates the action
24
without operation of a court order. Black Rock City, LLC v. Pershing Cty. Bd. of Comm’rs, 637 F.
25
App’x 488 (9th Cir. 2016) (citing Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077
26
(9th Cir. 1999)). Here, counsel for all parties in this action have signed and dated a stipulation to dismiss
27
this action, and filed it with the Court.
28
///
1
In light of parties’ stipulation for voluntary dismissal, this action is terminated by operation of
1
2
law without further order from the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party is to bear its own
3
litigation costs and attorney’s fees.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 21, 2020
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?