Sierra v. Spearman et al
Filing
107
ORDER Re: 106 Motion for $1,500.00 Settlement and Motion for Administrative Relief "Default Judgment" signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 02/09/2023. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
FRANCISCO SIERRA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
J. CASTELLANOS,
15
Case No. 1:17-cv-01691-ADA-EPG (PC)
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR $1,500
SETTLEMENT AND MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF “DEFAULT
JUDGMENT”
(ECF No. 106)
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff Francisco Sierra, a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed
20
this civil rights action on December 15, 2017. After the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal
21
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Court closed the case on January 30,
22
2023. (ECF Nos. 104, 105).
23
On February 7, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion for $1500 settlement and motion for
24
administrative relief “default judgment.” (ECF No. 106). Plaintiff states that, at the January 13,
25
2023 pretrial conference, he “finally agreed to settle this case for $1,500 dollars only, only this
26
case by itself.”1 (Id. at 1). He said defense counsel “agreed to . . . take care of everything
27
28
1
For readability, minor alterations, such as changing capitalization and punctuation, have been made to
some of Plaintiff’s quotations without indicating each change.
1
1
regarding payments etc. before the 29 of January 2023.” (Id. at 1-2). However, Plaintiff just
2
received a paper from defense counsel “that states [he] agreed on January 13, 2023 during our
3
video conference to terminate [his] suit.” (Id. at 2). Plaintiff asserts “this is in its entirety not
4
so.” (Id.). Plaintiff asks the Court to contact defense counsel “to correct this matter ASAP,” as
5
“the settlement was to be resolved before this month ended” and “the suit was settled for
6
$1,500 dollars.” (Id.). Additionally, Plaintiff states, that as he “mentioned before” staff at his
7
prison are invading his privacy and he asks the Court to put a stop to this immediately. (Id.).
8
It appears that Plaintiff is claiming that he expected to be paid immediately and yet has
9
not received his settlement payment. However, Plaintiff does not attach the settlement
10
agreement or any evidence regarding the timing of the payment. The Court notes that
11
settlement agreements involving the CDCR regularly provide for a delay between the
12
finalization of the agreement and the issuance of the payment, and such is likely the situation
13
here. Thus, the Court will deny the motion at this time without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling his
14
motion, along with evidence regarding the timing of the payment, should he believe that
15
Defendant has not paid the settlement money within the time provided in his settlement
16
agreement.
17
As for Plaintiff’s allegations regarding privacy violations occurring at his prison, the
18
Court has already addressed two motions regarding such allegations, explaining that the events
19
described were not connected to the claim or Defendant in this case, but that Plaintiff may file a
20
separate lawsuit if he believes his rights are being violated. (ECF Nos. 97, 98, 99, 102). Thus,
21
the Court will deny Plaintiff’s request to put a stop to privacy violations at his prison.
22
23
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 106) is denied without prejudice to the extent that Plaintiff
24
requests relief regarding his settlement agreement. Plaintiff may refile his motion if he
25
believes that he has not been paid within the time period provided under his settlement
26
agreement. Any such motion shall include a copy of the settlement or other evidence
27
regarding the specific timing of the payment.
28
2
1
2
2. Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 106) is denied to the extent that he asks the Court to
intervene regarding alleged privacy violations occurring at his prison.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 9, 2023
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?