Sierra v. Spearman et al
Filing
32
ORDER Referring Case to Settlement Conference Before a Magistrate Judge; ORDER Directing Clerk to Serve Supervising Deputy Attorney General Christopher Becker With a Copy of: 1) Plaintiff's 16 First Amended Complaint, 2) the Screening Order 19 & 25 ), and 3) This Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/4/19. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FRANCISCO SIERRA,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
M.E. SPEARMAN, et al.,
Case No. 1:17-cv-01691-DAD-EPG
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE BEFORE A MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
18
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SERVE
SUPERVISING DEPUTY ATTORNEY
GENERAL CHRISTOPHER BECKER WITH A
COPY OF: 1) PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 16.); 2) THE
SCREENING ORDER (ECF NOS. 19 & 25.);
AND 3) THIS ORDER
19
(ECF NO. 2)
15
16
17
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Francisco Sierra (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 1983. The Court has screened Plaintiff’s
complaint and found it states cognizable claims. At least one defendant has waived service.
The Court now directs the parties to participate in a settlement conference before a
Magistrate Judge to see if the case can reach a settlement before going further in litigation.
Plaintiff will be transported to the settlement conference and defense counsel will appear in
person. Neither side is waiving any claims, defenses or objections by participating in this
1
1
settlement conference.
2
If defense counsel believes this case is not suitable for an early settlement conference, the
3
Court will vacate the conference and proceed directly to litigation. Defense counsel is directed to
4
consider Plaintiff’s claim(s) and speak with Plaintiff following this order. If, after investigating
5
Plaintiff’s claim(s) and speaking with Plaintiff, and conferring with defense counsel’s supervisor,
6
defense counsel in good faith finds that a settlement conference would be unproductive, defense
7
counsel may opt out of this settlement conference by filing a notice with the Court.
8
9
10
If defense counsel does not opt out of the settlement conference, the Court will issue
separate order(s) setting the settlement conference and detailing the pre-settlement conference
procedures in due course.
11
Two weeks after the issuance of the order setting the settlement conference, in order to
12
better inform the parties and have a meaningful conference, the Court is requiring that both
13
parties disclose certain documents to each other about the case, as listed below. These documents
14
are relevant to the case and will most likely be disclosed in discovery shortly if this case goes to
15
litigation.1
16
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
17
1. Within thirty days from the date of service of this order, the assigned Deputy Attorney
18
General shall either: (1) file a notice that Defendants want to opt out of the settlement
19
conference; or (2) contact ADR Coordinator Sujean Park (spark@caed.uscourts.gov)
20
to schedule the settlement conference.2
21
2. If a settlement conference is set, no later than two weeks after the date of service of
22
the order setting the settlement conference, each party shall send the other parties, or
23
their attorneys (if represented), the documents listed below. The parties only need to
24
provide documents related to the claim(s) that the Court allowed past the screening
25
26
27
28
1
If any party has a legal objection to providing a particular document, that party shall file and serve a notice
describing its objection.
2
The Court may issue a separate issue setting a scheduling conference and ordering initial disclosures or may already
have done so. If difficulties arise in scheduling the settlement conference prior to the initial scheduling conference,
the parties may file a request for the Court to continue the initial scheduling conference.
2
1
stage. Additionally, defense counsel does not need to include any documents that
2
defense counsel believes are confidential or subject to the official information
3
privilege at this time. Plaintiff only needs to provide these documents if Plaintiff
4
already has them in his or her possession. Defense counsel shall send copies of the
5
following documents to Plaintiff and Plaintiff shall send copies to counsel for
6
Defendant(s):
7
a. Documents regarding exhaustion of Plaintiff’s claims, including 602s, Form 22s,
8
and responses from the appeals office;
9
b. All non-confidential documents regarding Rules Violation Reports, if any exist,
10
associated with the incident(s) alleged in the complaint, including disciplinary
11
charges and findings;
c. All of Plaintiff’s medical records related to the incident and/or condition at issue in
12
13
the case, if any exist; and
14
d. Chronos for transfer or Administrative Segregation placement related to the
15
16
17
incident(s) alleged in the complaint, if any exist.
Additionally, the parties may send any other documents related to the case that the parties
believe will assist in the settlement conference.
18
3. The parties remain obligated to keep the court informed of their current address. Any
19
change of address must be reported promptly to the Court in a separate document
20
captioned for this case and entitled “Notice of Change of Address.” See L.R. 182(f).
21
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
December 4, 2019
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?