Sierra v. Spearman et al
Filing
71
ORDER SETTING Settlement Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/22/2021. The Court vacates the remaining deadlines/dates in this case. (Marrujo, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
FRANCISCO SIERRA,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
Case No. 1:17-cv-01691-DAD-EPG (PC)
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
v.
J. CASTELLANOS,
14
(ECF No. 70)
Defendant.
15
16
17
Plaintiff Francisco Sierra is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this
18
civil rights action. Following the district judge’s decision adopting this Court’s findings and
19
recommendations, this case now proceeds on Plaintiff’s cruel-and-unusual-punishment claim
20
against Defendant Castellanos. (ECF No. 70). Upon consideration of the referral of this case for
21
22
23
further proceedings, the Court concludes that this case will benefit from a settlement conference.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
Within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order, the assigned
Deputy Attorney General shall contact ADR Coordinator Sujean Park (spark@caed.uscourts.gov)
24
to schedule the settlement conference. Thereafter, the Court will issue an order setting a
25
26
27
settlement conference. That order will include the date of the conference and the Magistrate Judge
who will oversee the conference, and may also include procedures required by that Judge.
2.
Because the parties will be pursuing settlement, the Court vacates the remaining
28
1
1
deadlines/dates in this case (i.e., the parties’ deadlines to file pretrial statements and the
2
telephonic trial confirmation hearing). (ECF No. 56). If necessary, the Court will issue another
3
scheduling order following the settlement conference.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
Dated:
October 22, 2021
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?