Lipsey v. Hand-Ronga, et al.
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING 11 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER Denying 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 04/19/2018. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR.,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
vs.
N. HAND-RONGA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
1:17-cv-01704-LJO-GSA-PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(ECF No. 11.)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(ECF No. 6.)
16
17
18
Christopher Lipsey, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
19
pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ' 1983. The matter was referred to
20
a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On March 21, 2018, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that
22
plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff was
23
granted fourteen days in which to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (Id.)
24
To date, no objections have been filed, and the time period for filing objections has expired.
25
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this
26
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,
27
the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper
28
analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
2
1.
3
4
The findings and recommendations entered by the Magistrate Judge on March
21, 2018, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and
2.
5
Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on January 8, 2018, is
DENIED.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
April 19, 2018
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?