E. & J. Gallo Winery, et al. v. Strategic Materials, Inc.

Filing 94

ORDER, after consideration of the parties' stipulation, and with good cause found, the parties may complete the depositions of Gallo 30(b)(6) witness by November 14, 2019, with all other deadlines to remain unchanged. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on November 13, 2019. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 FRANK M. PITRE (SBN 100077) fpitre@cpmlegal.com JULIE L. FIEBER (SBN 202857) jfieber@cpmlegal.com ABIGAIL D. BLODGETT (SBN 278813) ablodgett@cpmlegal.com COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP San Francisco Airport Office Center 840 Malcolm Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Telephone: (650) 697-6000 Facsimile: (650) 697-0577 7 8 9 10 11 D. GREG DURBIN (SBN 81749) greg.durbin@mccormickbarstow.com TIMOTHY J. BUCHANAN (SBN 100409) tim.buchanan@mccormickbarstow.com MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP 7647 N. Fresno Street Fresno, CA 93720 BENJAMIN WAGNER (SBN 163581) bwagner@gibsondunn.com MARTIE KUTSCHER, SBN 302650 mkutscherclark@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 1881 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1211 Telephone: 650.849.5300 Facsimile: 213.229.5333 JASON LO (SBN 219030) jlo@gibsondunn.com GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: (213) 229-7000 Facsimile: (213) 229-7520 Attorneys for Defendant 12 13 14 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 FRESNO DIVISION 18 19 E. & J. GALLO WINERY, a California corporation; GALLO GLASS COMPANY, a Nevada Corporation; CASE NO. 1:17-CV-01709-AWI-EPG 20 Plaintiff, 21 v. JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE CUTOFF FOR CERTAIN DEPOSITIONS 22 23 24 STRATEGIC MATERIALS, INC., a Delaware corporation; Defendant. 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE CUTOFF FOR CERTAIN DEPOSITIONS 1 THE PARTIES THROUGH THEIR UNDERSIGNED COUNSEL STIPULATE as follows: 2 WHEREAS, on September 10, 2019, this Court issued an Order Adopting Stipulation 3 Regarding Scheduling Order In Part And Further Modifying The Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 76), 4 which, among other things orders that all depositions of Gallo FRCP 30(b)(6) witnesses on Batch 5 Costs shall be completed by October 31, 2019; 6 WHEREAS, on October 23, 2019, this Court issued an Order Adopting Stipulation 7 Regarding Extending the Cutoff For Certain Depositions (Dkt. No 89), which orders that all Gallo 8 30(b)(6) depositions shall be completed by November 8, 2019; 9 10 11 WHEREAS, one of Gallo’s witnesses scheduled to be deposed on November 8, 2019 unexpectedly became ill, and was unable to provide testimony on November 8, 2019; WHEREAS, having reviewed the respective schedules of counsel and the remaining witness, 12 the parties propose completing the 30(b)(6) deposition of the previously-scheduled witness on or 13 before November 14, 2019. 14 THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and agree, and respectfully request that the Court 15 order that, the parties may complete the deposition of the final Gallo 30(b)(6) witness by November 16 14, 2019, and all other discovery deadlines remained unchanged. 17 18 DATED: November 12, 2019 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 19 By: s/ Jason Lo Jason Lo Attorneys for Defendant 20 21 22 DATED: November 12, 2019 COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP 23 24 25 By: s/ Julie L. Fieber Julie L. Fieber Attorneys for Plaintiffs 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE CUTOFF FOR CERTAIN DEPOSITIONS ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 Having considered the parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby orders: The parties may complete the depositions of Gallo 30(b)(6) witness by November 14, 2019, and all other deadlines remained unchanged. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 13, 2019 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER TO EXTEND THE CUTOFF FOR CERTAIN DEPOSITIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?