Harper v. California Prison Industry Authority et al

Filing 44

ORDER Regarding 42 Plaintiff's Request for Copy of Privilege Log and Request for Court to Serve Attorney General signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/15/2019. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JASON HARPER, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 JEFF BLAZO, Case No. 1:17-cv-01717-LJO-EPG (PC) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR COPY OF PRIVILEGE LOG AND REQUEST FOR COURT TO SERVE ATTORNEY GENERAL (ECF No. 42, p. 6) 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 Jason Harper (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 16). 19 On May 13, 2019, Plaintiff filed a request for a copy of the privilege log he attached to his 20 motion to compel, as well as for the Court to serve the assigned attorney general with a copy of 21 his brief in support of his motion to compel. (ECF No. 42, p. 6). Plaintiff makes these requests 22 because he is incarcerated in county jail and unable to make copies. 23 24 Both of Plaintiff’s requests will be denied. Defendant recently served Plaintiff with a copy of the privilege log. (ECF No. 41-1, pgs. 228-229). Thus, this request is now moot. 25 As for Plaintiff’s request to have the Court serve his brief in support of his motion to 26 compel on Defendant, Defendant has already received an electronic copy of the filing. This Court 27 will grant the motion in that it will not require further service of this brief on Defendant. 28 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s requests (ECF No. 42, p. 6) are GRANTED 1 1 in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff need not serve Defendant with a copy of his brief in 2 support of his motion to compel, in light of Defendant’s electronic filing. Plaintiff’s requests are 3 otherwise DENIED. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 15, 2019 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?