Harper v. California Prison Industry Authority et al

Filing 80

ORDER RE: Plaintiff's 79 Request for Clarification (No Action Required), signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/20/2019. (Orozco, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JASON HARPER, 10 11 12 Plaintiff, Case No. 1:17-cv-01717-LJO-EPG (PC) ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION (NO ACTION REQUIRED) v. (ECF NO. 79) JEFF BLAZO, 13 Defendant. 14 15 On December 18, 2019, Plaintiff filed a request for clarification. (EF No. 79). Plaintiff 16 states that he is confused as to the why the order dated December 9, 2019, was issued. Plaintiff 17 notes that his case was already closed, and that he already signed a revised stipulation. 18 Plaintiff is correct that he signed the revised stipulation, and that this case is closed. The 19 Court accidently sent him a copy of an order from a different case. No action is required from 20 Plaintiff, and Plaintiff should disregard the order dated December 9, 2019 (ECF No. 77). 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 20, 2019 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?