Williams v. Price et al

Filing 17

ORDER GRANTING Respondent's Second 16 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Petition, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 05/8/18. (Deadline: 06/11/2018) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COREY WILLIAMS, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 1:17-cv-01739-DAD-SKO HC v. BRANDON PRICE, et al., 15 Respondents. ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 16) 16 17 On May 8, 2018, Respondent filed an ex parte motion for a 31-day extension of time to 18 file a response to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. By declaration, Respondent’s counsel 19 states that due to the press of business, counsel requires additional time to prepare a response. 20 Good cause having been shown, the Court hereby ORDERS that the time for Respondent 21 to answer the petition in the above-captioned case shall be extended to June 11, 2018. 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 8, 2018 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 1 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?