Hargrove v. City of Bakersfield et al

Filing 26

AMENDED ORDER AFTER IN CAMERA REVIEW of Records of Vista West High School, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/2/2018. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TATYANA HARGROVE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 Case No.: 1:17-cv-01743- JLT AMENDED ORDER AFTER IN CAMERA REVIEW OF RECORDS OF VISTA WEST HIGH SCHOOL v. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 At the informal conference re: discovery dispute (Doc. 23), the parties agreed the Court would 17 18 conduct an in camera review of educational and employment records of the plaintiff. The Court has 19 received and reviewed the records from Vista West High School1, which included records from 20 Stockdale High School, and Tevis Junior High School. Of these records, the Court finds very few are 21 discoverable because they contain no information which may bear on the issues in this case or because 22 discovery of these records is not proportional to the needs of the case (Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(1). As to the 23 records to be disclosed, the Court makes no comment as to their admissibility. Thus, the Court 24 ORDERS: 1. 25 A portion of the document entitled “Vista West High School Student Discipline Profile” 26 27 1 28 In its original order, the Court mistakenly indicated that the records were provided by the Kern High School District. Since the Court issued the order, it received a “Certificate of no records,” from the Kern High School District and has confirmed that the records discussed here, were produced by the custodian of record from Vista West High School. 1 1 SHALL be disclosed. This document is numbered “1 of 13” through “13 of 13.” Of these, only pages 2 “1 of 13” through “9 of 13” SHALL be disclosed to the defendants; 2. 3 4 The document entitled “Stockdale High School Refrain From Verbal Contact . . .” dated “2/21/13” related to “Incident # 36501” SHALL be disclosed to the defendants; 3. 5 The eight documents entitled “Tevis Junior High School Disciplinary Action Form” 6 with incident dates listed as “09/22/2011,” “11/16/2011,” “02/08/2012,” “09/12/2011,” “06/02/2011,” 7 “05/12/2011,” “03/29/2011,” and “01/18/2011” SHALL be disclosed to the defendants; 4. 8 9 These documents remain due to be produced five court days from the date of the original order. 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 2, 2018 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?