Hargrove v. City of Bakersfield et al
Filing
32
ORDER DENYING 31 Stipulation to Modify the Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/7/2019. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Michael G. Marderosian, No. 77296
Heather S. Cohen, No. 263093
MARDEROSIAN & COHEN
1260 Fulton Street
Fresno, CA 93721
Telephone: (559) 441-7991
Facsimile: (559) 441-8170
Virginia Gennaro, No. 138877
City Attorney
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD
1501 Truxtun Avenue
Bakersfield, CA 93301
Telephone: (661) 326-3721
Facsimile: (661) 852-2020
10
11
Attorneys for:
12
Defendants CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, BAKERSIFELD POLICE
DEPARTMENT OFFICER CHRISTIOPHER MOORE, BAKERSFIELD
POLICE DEPARTMENT SENIOR OFFICER GEORGE VASQUEZ
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
TATYANA HARGROVE,
18
Plaintiff,
19
20
vs.
21
22
23
24
CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, BAKERSFIELD
POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER
CHRISTOPHER MOORE, BAKESFIELD
POLICE DEPARTMENT SENIOR OFFICER
G. VAZQUEZ,
25
26
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 1:17-CV-01743-JLT
STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE
SCHEDULING ORDER [DKT. NO. 14];
ORDER DENYING STIPULATION
(Doc. 31)
27
28
1
1
RECITALS
2
1.
WHEREAS, on March 26, 2018, this Court issued its Scheduling Order [Dkt. No. 16];
3
2.
WHEREAS, the Parties require additional time is needed in order to depose additional
4
witnesses;
5
6
3.
WHEREAS, the requested extension will not in any way affect the Pretrial Conference date
of September 16, 2019, or the Trial date of October 7, 2019.
STIPULATION
7
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties hereto through their respect attorneys
8
9
of records that the following deadlines and hearings are requested to be continued as follows:
Deadline/Hearing
Current Date
Requested Date
10
Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff
February 19, 2019
March 19, 2019
11
Expert Disclosures
March 8, 2019
April 5, 2019
12
Rebuttal Expert Disclosures
March 29, 2019
April 26, 2019
13
Expert Discovery Cutoff
April 15, 2019
May 13, 2019
14
Non-Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline
April 30, 2019
May 28, 2019
Deadline to Hear Non-Dispositive Motions
May 28, 2019
June 25, 2019
Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline
June 10, 2019
July 8, 2019
Deadline to Hear Non-Dispositive Motions
July 22, 2019
August 19, 2019
15
16
17
18
Dated: January 7, 2019
ALDERLAW, P.C.
19
/s/ Neil K. Gehlawat
By:________________________________
Neil K. Gehlawat
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TATYANA HARGROVE
20
21
22
23
Dated: January 7, 2019
THE LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS C. SEABAUGH
24
25
26
27
28
/s/ Thomas C. Seabaugh
By:________________________________
Thomas C. Seabaugh
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TATYANA HARGROVE
2
1
Dated: January 7, 2019.
MARDEROSIAN & COHEN
2
/s/ Michael G. Marderosian
By:________________________________
Michael G. Marderosian,
Attorneys for Defendants
above-named.
3
4
5
6
ORDER
7
8
9
The parties have failed to demonstrate any cause let alone good cause to amend the case schedule.
The offer no explanation why the needed depositions were not taken earlier or why they cannot be
completed by the current discovery deadline. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609-
10
610 (9th Cir. 1992). Thus, the stipulation is DENIED.
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
Dated:
January 7, 2019
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?