Hargrove v. City of Bakersfield et al

Filing 56

STIPULATION and ORDER 55 re Defendants' Motions in Limine Nos. 1, 5, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 17 and 19, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/25/2019. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Michael G. Marderosian, No. 77296 Heather S. Cohen, No. 263093 MARDEROSIAN & COHEN 1260 Fulton Street Fresno, CA 93721 Telephone: (559) 441-7991 Facsimile: (559) 441-8170 5 6 7 8 9 Virginia Gennaro, No. 138877 City Attorney CITY OF BAKERSFIELD 1501 Truxtun Avenue Bakersfield, CA 93301 Telephone: (661) 326-3721 Facsimile: (661) 852-2020 10 Attorneys for: Defendants CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, CHRISTIOPHER MOORE and GEORGE VASQUEZ 11 Neil K. Gehlawat, Esq. ALDERLAW, P.C. 1875 Century Park East, Suite 1500 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 275-9131 Facsimile: (310) 275-9132 12 13 14 15 18 Thomas C. Seabaugh, Esq. THE LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS C. SEABAUGH 601 West Fifth Street, Ste. 800 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 225-5850 19 Attorneys for: Plaintiff TATYANA HARGROVE 16 17 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 21 22 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TATYANA HARGROVE, 23 Plaintiff, 24 25 vs. 26 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al. 27 Defendants. 28 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:17-CV-01743-JLT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE NOS. 1, 5, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 17 AND 19 (Doc. 55) 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 RECITALS WHEREAS the Parties filed their Joint Pretrial Statement on September 9, 2019 [Dkt. No. 44] wherein Defendants listed a total of 23 Motions in Limine they intended to file; WHEREAS the Court issued its Pretrial Order on September 16, 2019 [Dkt. No. 47] listing the Motions in Limine and ordering that they be filed on or before September 23, 2019; WHEREAS, on September 17, 2019, the Parties met and conferred and determined that certain issues raised by the Defendants in their Motions in Limine were not in dispute. STIPULATION 8 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties hereto, through their respective 9 attorneys of record, that: 10 11 12 13 14 15 1. The parties agree that no party will introduce, reference, or allude to the fact that Christopher Moore is no longer paired with his K9 partner; 2. The parties agree that no party will introduce, reference, make statements to the effect or allude to the Bakersfield Police Department or its officers as the “deadliest police force in America”; 3. The parties agree that no party will introduce, reference, or allude to the recent report issued by the ACLU; 16 4. 17 of Justice letter; 18 19 5. The parties agree that no party will introduce, reference, or allude to the 2004 Department The parties agree that no party will introduce, reference, or argue that either the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or any other agency is investigating the City of Bakersfield Police Department; 20 6. 21 22 23 24 Non-party witnesses will be excluded from the Courtroom; 7. No party will make any “Golden Rule Argument”; 8. The parties agree that no party will introduce, reference, or allude to the recent arrest/placement on administrative leave of Evan Demestihas; 9. The parties enter into this Stipulation with the understanding that any party is free to argue 25 at trial that the door has been opened with respect to any of the above categories. In such a situation, that 26 party must raise the issue outside the presence of the jury and seek the Court’s permission to depart from 27 this Stipulation. 28 Additionally, the Plaintiff and her counsel agree that: 10. The Plaintiff agrees to waive past medical expenses; 2 1 2 11. Dr. Pangarkar is not going to testify that Ms. Hargrove needs any sort of neuropsychological evaluation. 3 4 Dated: September 25, 2019 THE LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS C. SEABAUGH 5 /s/ Thomas C. Seabaugh By:________________________________ Thomas C. Seabaugh, Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 7 8 9 Dated: September 25, 2019 ALDERLAW PC 10 /s/ Neil Gehlawat By:________________________________ Neil Gehlawat, Attorneys for Plaintiff 11 12 13 14 Dated: September 25, 2019 MARDEROSIAN & COHEN 15 16 17 18 /s/ Michael G. Marderosian By:________________________________ Michael G. Marderosian, Attorneys for Defendants above-named. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 1 ORDER 2 IT IS SO ORDERED THAT: 3 1. The Parties agree that no Party will introduce, reference, or allude to the fact that 4 Christopher Moore is no longer paired with his K9 partner; 5 6 2. allude to the Bakersfield Police Department or its officers as the “deadliest police force in America”; 7 8 The Parties agree that no Party will introduce, reference, make statements to the effect or 3. The Parties agree that no Party will introduce, reference, or allude to the recent report issued by the ACLU; 9 4. 10 of Justice letter; 11 5. 12 13 The Parties agree that no Party will introduce, reference, or allude to the 2004 Department The Parties agree that no Party will introduce, reference, or argue that either the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or any other agency is investigating the City of Bakersfield Police Department; 6. Non-party witnesses will be excluded from the Courtroom; 7. No party will make any “Golden Rule Argument”; 8. 14 The Parties agree that no Party will introduce, reference, or allude to the surveillance video 15 16 of the incident at the Grocery Outlet store; 17 18 9. The parties agree that no party will introduce, reference, or allude to the recent arrest/placement on administrative leave of Evan Demestihas; 19 10. In the event a party feels that the door has been opened with regard to any of the above 20 categories, that party will raise the issue outside of the presence of the jury and seek the Court’s permission 21 to depart from this Order; 11. 22 23 Limine Nos. 1, 5, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 17 and 19. 12. 24 25 26 Based on the foregoing, it is unnecessary for the Court to rule on Defendants’ Motions in The Plaintiff waives any claim to past medical expenses. /// /// /// 27 /// 28 4 1 13. 2 evaluation. Dr. Pangarkar will not testify that the Plaintiff needs any sort of neuro-psychological 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 25, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?