Howard v. AM Retail Group, Inc., et al.

Filing 23

ORDER closing case 22 signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/10/2018. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAWONA HOWARD,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

Case No.: 1:17-CV-1751- JLT
ORDER CLOSING CASE
(Doc. 22)

AM RETAIL GROUP, INC., et al.

15

Defendants.

16
17

The parties have stipulated to dismiss the action with each side to bear their own fees and

18

costs. (Doc. 22) The stipulation relies upon Fed.R.Civ.P. 41, which permits the plaintiff to

19

dismiss an action without a court order “by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties

20

who have appeared.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because all parties who have appeared in the

21

action signed the stipulation (Doc. 79), it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of

22

San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to

23

close this action.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

December 10, 2018

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE