Cervantes v. Wagstaff 100, Inc. et al

Filing 10

ORDER Directing the Clerk of the Court to Close Case re 9 , signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 4/3/18. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

AURORA CERVANTES,

10
11
12

Plaintiff,

Case No. 1:17-cv-01766-DAD-EPG
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT TO CLOSE CASE

v.
(ECF No. 9)
WAGSTAFF 100, INC., et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

On April 2, 2018, Plaintiff Aurora Cervantes filed a notice to dismiss this action with

16

prejudice. (ECF No. 9). In light of the notice, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice.

17

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997);

18

Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Even if the defendant has filed a motion to

19

dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule

20

41(a)(1).”). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24

Dated:

April 3, 2018

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28
1