Carr v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 62

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 60 Motion to Compel, without prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/27/2020. 14-Day Filing Deadline.(Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLAUDE CARR, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 1:17-cv-01769-DAD-SAB (PC) v. (ECF No. 60) 14 TED PRUITT, FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE Defendant. 15 16 17 Claude Carr (“Plaintiff”) is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 22, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel 19 discovery. 20 Plaintiff’s motion to compel alleges that he submitted interrogatories and requests for 21 production of documents to Defendant and did not receive complete responses. While Plaintiff 22 identifies the specific interrogatories and requests for production that he seeks further response 23 to, he fails to address why the interrogatories or production responses are deficient. A motion to 24 compel must be accompanied by a copy of Plaintiff’s discovery requests at issue and a copy of 25 Defendant’s responses to the discovery requests. Here, Plaintiff did not provide a copy of 26 Defendant’s responses. 27 Further, as the moving party, Plaintiff bears the burden of informing the Court which 28 discovery requests are the subject of his motion to compel and, for each disputed response, why 1 1 Defendant’s objection is not justified. Plaintiff may not simply assert that he has served 2 discovery requests, that he is dissatisfied, and that he wants an order compelling responses. The 3 Court shall deny Plaintiff’s motion on the ground that it is procedurally deficient. The denial 4 will be without prejudice to curing the deficiencies and re-filing the motion, within fourteen 5 days. Plaintiff is advised that discovery in this matter is set to close on June 23, 2020 and 6 7 pursuant to the discovery and scheduling order, “[t]he deadline for the completion of all 8 discovery, including filing all motions to compel discovery” the discovery deadline. (Discovery 9 and Scheduling Order, ¶ 7, ECF No. 30.) Discovery motions that are filed after the discovery 10 deadline will not be considered absent good cause. (Id.) 11 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 12 1. Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery, filed May 22, 2020, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as procedurally deficient; and 13 2. 14 Plaintiff may file a motion to compel within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of this order. 15 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: May 27, 2020 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?