Driver v. The Special Master et al

Filing 9

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 8 Motion for Emergency Relief and Monetary Sanctions, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/1/17. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 IN RE: 9 10 BILLY DRIVER, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:17-mc-00001-SAB ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF AND MONETARY SANCTIONS [ECF No. 8] On January 3, 2017, the Court received a notice from the Plaintiff requesting access to the electronic case filing system at Kern Valley State Prison (“KVSP”) in Delano, California. On January 30, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for emergency relief and monetary sanctions in the amount of 27.9 billion dollars. Plaintiff is advised that the purpose of opening this miscellaneous action was to determine 19 solely the issue of whether Plaintiff would be granted leave and/or exemption from e-filing his civil 20 rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated January 27, 2017, the Court 21 determined that Plaintiff has had adequate access to the law library and e-filing system at KVSP, but 22 simply failed to properly utilize such services. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff is advised that if and when 23 Plaintiff files a civil rights complaint by way of the e-filing system, a civil rights action will be opened 24 and assigned a civil case number. Accordingly, because this action was opened for the limited 25 purpose of determining whether Plaintiff would be granted exemption from e-filing his complaint 26 which was denied, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for an emergency 27 28 1 1 relief and monetary sanctions is DENIED, and the Court will not accept any further filings in this 2 closed case. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 February 1, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?