Paula Gordon v. Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., et al.

Filing 85

STIPULATION and ORDER 84 to Continue Expert Disclosure Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/29/2019. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Dylan B. Carp (State Bar No. 196846) Angel R. Sevilla (State Bar No. 239072) Stephanie T. Yang (State Bar No. 280006) JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 50 California Street, 9th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 394-9400 Facsimile: (415) 394-9401 Email: carpd@jacksonlewis.com angel.sevilla@jacksonlewis.com stephanie.yang@jacksonlewis.com Attorneys for Defendant NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC., Victor L. George Wayne C. Smith LAW OFFICES OF VICTOR L. GEORGE 20355 Hawthorne Blvd., First Floor Torrance, CA 90503 Tel. (310) 698-0990 Fax (310) 698-0995 vgeorge@vgeorgelaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff PAULA GORDON 18 Todd B. Scherwin Cheryl L. Schreck Fisher & Phillips LLP 444 S Flower Street, Suite 1500 Los Angeles, Ca 90071 Tel. (213) 330-4452 Fax (213) 330-4501 Email: cschreck@fisherphillips.com tscherwin@fisherphillips.com 19 Attorneys for Defendant Erik Mendoza 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCLOSURE DEADLINES Case No. 1:18-cv-00007 (DAD) (JLT) 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 PAULA GORDON, an individual, 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff, v. NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC. a business entity, form unknown; KGET-TV 17, a business entity, form unknown; The CW NETWORK, LLC, a business entity, form unknown; TELEMUNDO 17.3, a business entity, form unknown; ERIK MENDOZA, an individual; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive Case No. 1:18-cv-00007 (DAD) (JLT) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCLOSURE DEADLINE State Complaint Filed: 09/22/17 Removal Filed: 10/31/17 Trial Date: 01/07/20 Defendants. 13 14 15 16 TO THE HONORABLE COURT: WHEREAS, the Court’s Scheduling Order sets forth the deadline for expert disclosures by April 1, 2019. (ECF #78). 17 WHEREAS, in accordance with the Court’s Scheduling Order, the Parties’ 18 expert disclosure should include the information under Federal Rules of Civil 19 Procedure, Rules 26(a)(2), (A), (B), and (C). (ECF #58). 20 WHEREAS, pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 21 Plaintiff appeared for Defendants’ Independent Medical Examination on March 21, 22 2019, before Dr. Delia Maria Silva. 23 24 WHEREAS, Dr. Silva is in the process of preparing her report and the Defendants have not obtained all of Plaintiff’s therapy records from Plaintiff. 25 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Plaintiff Paula Gordon, 26 and Defendants, Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. and Erik Mendoza, through their 27 respective counsel, to an extension of the following discovery deadlines, subject to 28 the Court’s approval: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCLOSURE DEADLINES Case No. 1:18-cv-00007 (DAD) (JLT) 1 1. The Parties will exchange expert witness disclosures of information under 2 FRCP Rules 26(a)(2)(A) and 26(a)(2)(B)(iv), (v), and (vi) by April 1, 2019. 3 2. The Parties will exchange expert witness disclosures of information and 4 reports under FRCP Rules 26(a)(2)(B)(i), (ii), and (iii) by April 19, 2019. 5 3. Defendants are permitted to supplement, revise, or amend their expert report, 6 if necessary, within two weeks after receiving Plaintiff’s remaining therapy 7 records. 8 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 9 Dated: March 28, 2019 JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 10 11 By: 12 13 14 /s/ Angel R. Sevilla Dylan B. Carp Angel R. Sevilla Stephanie T. Yang Attorneys for Defendant NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC 15 Dated: March 28, 2019 LAW OFFICES OF VICTOR L. GEORGE 16 17 By: 18 19 20 21 Counsel for Plaintiff, Wayne C.Smith, authorized submission of his e-signature on this document in writing, by e-mail dated March 28, 2019; 2:09 P..M. 22 23 24 25 26 27 /s/Wayne C. Smith Victor L. George Wayne C. Smith Attorneys for Plaintiff PAULA GORDON /// //// /// /// 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCLOSURE DEADLINES Case No. 1:18-cv-00007 (DAD) (JLT) 1 Dated: March 28, 2019 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 2 By: 3 4 5 /s/Cheryl Schreck Cheryl Schreck Attorneys for Defendant ERIK MENDOZA Counsel for Defendant, Cheryl Schreck, authorized submission of his e-signature on this document in writing, by e-mail dated March 28, 2019;1:59 P.M. 6 7 8 9 [PROPOSED] ORDER 10 The Court will GRANT the current stipulation.1 However, the Court anticipates that no 11 further stipulations to the amend the case schedule will be filed. The Court notes that since 12 February 4, 2019, every docket entry in this case relates to amending the case schedule in some 13 way. This implies that counsel are treating the case schedule cavalierly. If so, that SHALL end 14 now. They SHALL abide by the remainder of the schedule and may seek amendment of it only 15 upon a showing of exceptional good cause. Any future stipulation will be summarily denied if it 16 fails to meet this standard. 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 19 March 29, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 In doing so, the Court does not accept that good cause for the amendment has been shown. The failure to obtain needed records and the failure to schedule the IME sooner are situations within the defendant’s control. Indeed, the Court ordered in its scheduling order that, “In the event an expert will offer opinions related to an independent medical or mental health evaluation, the examination SHALL occur sufficiently in advance of the disclosure deadline so the expert’s report fully details the expert’s opinions in this regard.” (Doc. 58) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE EXPERT DISCLOSURE DEADLINES Case No. 1:18-cv-00007 (DAD) (JLT)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?