Paula Gordon v. Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., et al.

Filing 94

ORDER DENYING 91 Stipulation to Amend the Case Schedule Related to Expert Discovery, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/8/2019. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) PAULA GORDON, Case No.: 1:18-cv-0007 - DAD - JLT ORDER DENYING THE STIPULATION TO AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE RELATED TO EXPERT DISCOVERY (Doc. 91) 16 17 Before the Court is the third request of counsel to amend the case schedule related to expert 18 discovery. (Doc. 91) Counsel indicate they need the extension to complete a second session of 19 deposition of Dr. Zackler (a medical expert), a second session of D. Jan Duffy (a “management 20 practice” expert) and the deposition of the Rhoma Young (a rebuttal “management practice” expert). 21 Id. at 2. Counsel fail to explain why more than one session of Dr. Zackler and Ms. Duffy are being 22 taken or why Ms. Young’s deposition cannot be scheduled to be completed before May 15, 2019, the 23 deadline to complete this discovery imposed less than a month ago—at the request of counsel. 24 Notably, counsel report that they will complete Dr. Zackler before the deadline. (Doc. 91 at 2) 25 In any event, when counsel last sought to amend the case schedule, the Court emphasized to 26 them that it would not continue to tolerate requests to amend the case schedule. Indeed, it had been 27 just a couple of weeks since they filed their prior stipulation to amend the case schedule. (See Docs. 28 84, 88) Despite this, in their current stipulation, they fail to provide an explanation demonstrating good 1 1 cause to amend the case schedule once again. Thus, the request is DENIED. Counsel SHALL 2 redouble their efforts to complete the expert discovery within the current deadline. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 8, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?