Paula Gordon v. Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., et al.

Filing 97

ORDER REGARDING 95 Witness Alyssa Duran, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/9/2019. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAULA GORDON, an individual, 12 13 Case No. 1:18-cv-00007 (DAD) (JLT) [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WITNESS ALYSSA DURAN Plaintiff, v. (Doc. 95) 14 15 16 17 18 NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC. a business entity, form unknown; KGET-TV 17, a business entity, form unknown; The CW NETWORK, LLC, a business entity, form unknown; TELEMUNDO 17.3, a business entity, form unknown; ERIK MENDOZA, an individual; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive Defendants. 19 20 TO THE HONORABLE COURT: 21 WHEREAS third party witness, Alyssa Duran, evaded Defendants Nexstar Broadcasting, 22 Inc. and Erik Mendoza’s (“Defendants”) attempts to serve her with a deposition subpoena prior to 23 the February 15, 2019 discovery completion deadline. 24 25 WHEREAS on February 20, 2019, the Court extended the fact discovery deadline to April 30, 2019, solely to allow Defendants the opportunity to take Duran’s deposition. (ECF #80). 26 WHEREAS after the Court extended the fact discovery deadline to allow Defendants 27 additional time to depose Duran, Defendants continued to make exhaustive and diligent attempts 28 to serve Duran with a deposition subpoena in order to take her deposition. 1 WHEREAS Duran continued to evade Defendants’ attempts to personally serve her with a 1 2 deposition subpoena. WHEREAS the Court subsequently granted the Parties’ stipulation to serve Duran a 3 4 deposition subpoena by mail (ECF #83). 5 6 WHEREAS Duran was served by mail for a deposition appearance to take place on April 26, 2019. 7 8 WHEREAS Duran failed to appear at her deposition on the date set forth in the subpoena on April 26, 2019. 9 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Plaintiff Paula Gordon, and Defendants, 10 through their respective counsel, as follows: 11 (1) 12 13 The fact discovery deadline will remain open indefinitely solely for the parties to take the deposition of Duran before trial. (2) Should Plaintiff’s counsel serve Duran with a trial subpoena before the trial date of January 14 7, 2020, in the event the Court finds Duran’s testimony to be admissible at trial, such trial 15 subpoena must be accompanied by a deposition subpoena for Defendants to take Duran’s 16 deposition no later than nine (9) days before the date set forth in the trial subpoena. 17 (3) Should Plaintiff’s counsel serve Duran with a trial subpoena during trial, in the event the 18 Court finds Duran’s testimony to be admissible at trial, such trial subpoena must be 19 accompanied by a deposition subpoena for Defendants to take Duran’s deposition at least 20 two (2) days before Duran testifies at trial. 21 (4) Duran shall not testify at trial until Defendants have had the opportunity to depose Duran. 22 (5) Should Ms. Duran fail to comply with said subpoenas, any party shall have an opportunity 23 to file the appropriate pre-trial motions to seek the appropriate remedies available to the 24 Parties. 25 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 26 27 28 2 1 Dated: May 8, 2019 JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 2 3 By: Dylan B. Carp Angel R. Sevilla Stephanie T. Yang Attorneys for Defendant NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, IN 4 5 6 7 8 Dated: May 8, 2019 LAW OFFICES OF VICTOR L. GEORGE 9 By: 10 /sWayne C. Smith Victor L. George Wayne C. Smith Attorneys for Plaintiff PAULA GORDON 11 12 13 Counsel for Plaintiff, Wayne C. Smith, authorized submission of his e-signature on this document in writing, by e-mail dated May 8, 2019, 4:43 p.m. 14 15 16 Dated: May 8, 2019 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 17 By: 18 /s/ Cheryl Schreck Cheryl Schreck Attorneys for Defendant ERIK MENDOZA 19 20 Counsel for Defendant, Cheryl Schreck, authorized submission of his e-signature on this document in writing, by e-mail dated May 8, 2019, 11:45 a.m. 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: 25 May 9, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?