Garcia v. Moreno et al
Filing
20
ORDER VACATING May 17, 2018, Order 18 Granting Plaintiff's 17 Request for Service by United States Marshal, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 05/21/18. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LENIN GARCIA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
E. MORENO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Case No.: 1:18-cv-00014-SAB (PC)
ORDER VACATING MAY 17, 2018, ORDER
GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR
SERVICE BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL
[ECF No. 18]
Plaintiff Lenin Garcia is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1983.
On March 29, 2018, the Court authorized service of the complaint for Plaintiff’s failure to
19
20
protect claim against Defendants E. Moreno, Pena, H. Hinojosa, Segura and M. Silva, excessive force
21
against Defendant Moreno, retaliation against Defendants Moreno, Pena, Hinojosa, Segura and E.
22
Silva, and failure to decontaminate cell against Defendants D. Hick, M. Harris, and E. Silva. (ECF
23
No. 10.) In that order, Plaintiff was advised that he was responsible for service on Defendants and
24
provided instructions on how to do so. (Id.)
25
On May 15, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting service to be done by the United States
26
Marshal. (ECF No. 17.) On May 17, 2018, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request for service by the
27
United States Marshal and directed Plaintiff to complete and return the USM-185 forms. (ECF No.
28
18.)
1
On May 21, 2018, waivers of service were returned executed by all Defendants. (ECF No. 19.)
1
2
In light of the return of the waivers of service, the Court’s May 17, 2018 (ECF No. 18), is HEREBY
3
VACATED.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
7
May 21, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?