Garcia v. Moreno et al

Filing 21

ORDER Setting Settlement Conference on July 16 2018 and STAYING CASE FOR NINETY DAYS, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 0/21/18. (Settlement Conference set for 7/16/2018 at 08:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe at CSP-Corcoran) Case stayed: 90-Days(Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LENIN GARCIA, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 1:18-cv-00014-DAD-SAB (PC) ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ON JULY 16, 2018 AND STAYING CASE FOR NINETY DAYS E. MORENO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Lenin Garcia is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has determined that this case will benefit from a settlement conference. 19 As set forth in the screening order, Plaintiff has stated a potentially cognizable civil rights claim. 20 Thus, the Court will stay this action until the completion of the settlement conference. Therefore, this 21 case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe to conduct a settlement conference at 22 the California State Prison, Corcoran (CSP-COR), 4001 King Avenue, Corcoran, CA 93212 on July 23 16, 2018, at 8:30 a.m. The Court will issue the necessary transportation order in due course. 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe 26 27 28 on July 16, 2018, at CSP-COR. 2. A representative with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding settlement shall attend in person. 1 1 3. Those in attendance must be prepared to discuss the claims, defenses and damages. The 2 failure of any counsel, party or authorized person subject to this order to appear in person 3 may result in the imposition of sanctions. In addition, the conference will not proceed and 4 will be reset to another date. 5 4. Defendants shall provide a confidential settlement statement to the following email 6 address: bamorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff shall mail his confidential settlement 7 statement to U.S. District Court, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721, 8 “Attention: Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.” The envelope shall be marked 9 “Confidential Settlement Statement”. Settlement statements shall arrive no later than July 10 9, 2018. Parties shall also file a Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement 11 Statement (See Local Rule 270(d)). Settlement statements should not be filed with the 12 Clerk of the Court nor served on any other party. Settlement statements shall be clearly 13 marked Aconfidential@ with the date and time of the settlement conference indicated 14 prominently thereon. 15 16 5. The confidential settlement statement shall be no longer than five pages in length, typed or neatly printed, and include the following: 17 a. A brief statement of the facts of the case. 18 b. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon 19 which the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties= likelihood of 20 prevailing on the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in 21 dispute. 22 23 24 25 26 27 c. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial, and trial. d. The party=s position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of past settlement discussions, offers, and demands. e. A brief statement of each party=s expectations and goals for the settlement conference, including how much a party is willing to accept and/or willing to pay. 28 2 6. This case is stayed for ninety days, pending the completion of the settlement conference. 1 The case deadlines will be set following the settlement conference, if necessary. 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 May 21, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?