Phillip Bonnette et al vs Dick, et al
Filing
8
ORDER GRANTING 6 7 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/12/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
PHILLIP BONNETTE and LINDA FAYE
GRANT-JONES,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 1:18-cv-0046-DAD-BAM
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO
PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF
FEES OR COSTS
v.
(ECF. Nos. 6, 7)
LELAND ROSS DICK, et al,
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiffs Phillip Bonnette and Linda Faye Grant-Jones are proceeding pro se and have
19
requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code section
20
1915(a). (ECF Nos. 6, 7). Plaintiffs have made the showing required by section 1915(a), and
21
accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
22
Plaintiffs are advised that the Court screens the complaints of pro se litigants proceeding in
23
forma pauperis pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code section 1915(e)(2). The Court must
24
dismiss a complaint if the litigant has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that
25
fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a
26
defendant(s) who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). As a result, summonses
27
will not issue at this time. The Court will direct the United States Marshal to serve Plaintiffs’
28
complaint only after the Court has screened the complaint and determined that it contains
1
1
cognizable claims for relief against the named defendants. The Court has a large number of such
2
cases pending before it and will screen Plaintiffs’ complaint in due course.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Barbara
June 12, 2018
A. McAuliffe
_
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?