Franco v. Espinoza

Filing 22

ORDER Clarifying Order Requiring Respondent to File a Response re 21 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/22/19. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MARIA ANTONIA FRANCO,

12
13
14
15

No. 1:18-cv-00057-DAD-SKO (HC)

Petitioner,
v.
JANEL ESPINOZA, Warden,

ORDER CLARIFYING ORDER
REQUIRING RESPONDENT
TO FILE A RESPONSE

Respondent.

16
17
18
19

Petitioner, Maria Antonia Franco, is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel with a petition
for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 12, 2018, Petitioner, through
counsel, filed an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 14). On December 11, 2018,

20
21
22

the undersigned directed respondent to respond to the petition within sixty days.
On January 18, 2019, Respondent requested the undersigned clarify whether Respondent

23

should respond to the original petition for writ of habeas corpus, (Doc. 1), filed on November 3,

24

2017, or the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. Respondent shall respond to the amended

25

petition for writ of habeas corpus, (Doc. 14), filed on November 12, 2018.

26
27
28
1

1
2

This order does not change the deadlines established in the Order Directing Respondent to
File a Response to the Petition, (Doc. 17), signed on December 11, 2018.

3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7

Dated:

January 22, 2019

/s/

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

.