Gould v. Ahlin et al

Filing 6

ORDER RELATING Cases and REASSIGNING Action to District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill and Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/27/18. Old case number: 1:18-cv-00076-BAM (PC). New case number: 1:18-cv-00076-LJO-MJS (PC). (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID GOULD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 Case No. 1:18-cv-00076-BAM (PC) v. PAM AHLIN, et al., 15 New Case No. 1:18-cv-00076-LJO-MJS (PC) ORDER RELATING CASES AND REASSIGNING ACTION TO DISTRICT JUDGE LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL AND MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL J. SENG Defendants. 16 On January 17, 2018, Plaintiff filed this Civil Rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 17 18 § 1983 challenging emergency amendments to Cal. Code Regs. tit. 9, § 4350 as violating the U.S. 19 Constitution. (ECF No. 1.) The Court’s review of this case reveals that it is related under Local Rule 231 to the action 20 21 entitled Rainwater v. Allen, 1:18-cv-00049-LJO-MJS. Both actions are based on the same 22 underlying facts and involve overlapping questions of law and fact. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 24 1. The Office of the Clerk shall relate this case with case 1:18-cv-00049-LJO-MJS (PC); 25 2. This case shall be assigned to the docket of District Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill and reassigned to the docket of Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng; 26 27 28 3. The new case number shall be 1:18-cv-00076-LJO-MJS (PC), and all future pleadings and/or correspondence must be so numbered. The parties are advised that 1 1 use of an incorrect case number, including initials, may result in a delay of documents 2 being processed and copies thereof being correctly distributed and received by the 3 appropriate judicial officer. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara February 27, 2018 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?