Harris v. Sexton, et al.

Filing 101

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/9/2023 ORDERING that Within thirty days of the filed date of this order, defendants shall file a response to plaintiff's 5/6/2022 93 Motion to amend; and Within twenty days after he is served with defendants' response, Plaintiff may file a reply.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EARNEST S. HARRIS, 12 No. 1:18-cv-0080 KJM DB P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 SEXTON, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 17 18 Plaintiff alleges defendants’ use of the Guard One welfare check system violated his rights under 19 the Eighth Amendment. In an order filed January 17, 2023, Chief Judge Mueller granted in part 20 and denied in part plaintiff’s February 18, 2021 motion to amend the second amended complaint. 21 On May 6, 2022, plaintiff filed another motion to amend the complaint. Defendants will be 22 ordered to file a response. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 24 1. Within thirty days of the filed date of this order, defendants shall file a response to plaintiff’s May 6, 2022 motion to amend; and 25 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 2 3 2. Within twenty days after he is served with defendants’ response, plaintiff may file a reply. Dated: March 9, 2023 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 DLB:9 DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/harr0080.mta2.resp 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?