Harris v. Sexton, et al.
Filing
101
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/9/2023 ORDERING that Within thirty days of the filed date of this order, defendants shall file a response to plaintiff's 5/6/2022 93 Motion to amend; and Within twenty days after he is served with defendants' response, Plaintiff may file a reply.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EARNEST S. HARRIS,
12
No. 1:18-cv-0080 KJM DB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
SEXTON, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
17
18
Plaintiff alleges defendants’ use of the Guard One welfare check system violated his rights under
19
the Eighth Amendment. In an order filed January 17, 2023, Chief Judge Mueller granted in part
20
and denied in part plaintiff’s February 18, 2021 motion to amend the second amended complaint.
21
On May 6, 2022, plaintiff filed another motion to amend the complaint. Defendants will be
22
ordered to file a response.
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
24
1.
Within thirty days of the filed date of this order, defendants shall file a response to
plaintiff’s May 6, 2022 motion to amend; and
25
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
2
3
2. Within twenty days after he is served with defendants’ response, plaintiff may file a
reply.
Dated: March 9, 2023
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DLB:9
DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/harr0080.mta2.resp
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?