Harris v. Sexton, et al.

Filing 108

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/8/2023 ORDERING, within 30 days, defendant Flores shall file a response to the 42 second amended complaint. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EARNEST S. HARRIS, 12 No. 1:18-cv-0080 KJM DB P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 SEXTON, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 17 18 §1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants’ use of the Guard One security check system violated his 19 Eighth Amendment rights. On July 5, 2023, this court ordered plaintiff to file a renewed motion 20 to amend his second amended complaint within thirty days. Thirty days have passed and plaintiff 21 has not filed a renewed motion or otherwise responded to the court’s July 5 order. Since plaintiff 22 has failed to comply with the court’s order despite ample opportunity to do so, this court will not 23 further delay these proceedings. The case will proceed on plaintiff’s second amended complaint 24 filed February 2, 2019 (ECF No. 42), as supplemented with plaintiff’s Eighth and First 25 Amendment claims against defendant Flores (see Jan. 17, 2023 Order (ECF No. 100)). 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 It does not appear that defendant Flores has filed a response to the second amended 2 complaint, as supplemented. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within 30 days of the 3 date of this order, defendant Flores shall file a response to the second amended complaint. 4 Dated: September 8, 2023 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 DLB:9 DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/harr0080.flores ans 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?