Harris v. Sexton, et al.
Filing
108
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 9/8/2023 ORDERING, within 30 days, defendant Flores shall file a response to the 42 second amended complaint. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EARNEST S. HARRIS,
12
No. 1:18-cv-0080 KJM DB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
SEXTON, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C.
17
18
§1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants’ use of the Guard One security check system violated his
19
Eighth Amendment rights. On July 5, 2023, this court ordered plaintiff to file a renewed motion
20
to amend his second amended complaint within thirty days. Thirty days have passed and plaintiff
21
has not filed a renewed motion or otherwise responded to the court’s July 5 order. Since plaintiff
22
has failed to comply with the court’s order despite ample opportunity to do so, this court will not
23
further delay these proceedings. The case will proceed on plaintiff’s second amended complaint
24
filed February 2, 2019 (ECF No. 42), as supplemented with plaintiff’s Eighth and First
25
Amendment claims against defendant Flores (see Jan. 17, 2023 Order (ECF No. 100)).
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
It does not appear that defendant Flores has filed a response to the second amended
2
complaint, as supplemented. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within 30 days of the
3
date of this order, defendant Flores shall file a response to the second amended complaint.
4
Dated: September 8, 2023
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
DLB:9
DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/harr0080.flores ans
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?