Harris v. Sexton, et al.

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING Request for Preliminary Injunctive Relief 9 , signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/21/2018. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

EARNEST S. HARRIS,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

SEXTON, et al.,

15

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
Defendants.
(Doc. No. 9)

16
17
18
19

No. 1:18-cv-00080-DAD-SAB

Plaintiff Earnest S. Harris is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

20

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 15, 2018, the assigned magistrate judge issued

21

findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s request for preliminary injunctive

22

relief raised in his civil rights complaint be denied. The findings and recommendations were

23

served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty-one

24

days. Plaintiff filed objections April 9, 2018. (Doc. No. 13.)

25

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the undersigned has

26

conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

27

undersigned concludes the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by

28

proper analysis. Plaintiff’s objections do not demonstrate that he is likely to succeed on the
1

1

merits of this action, even though certain of his claims have been found cognizable.

2

Accordingly:

3

1. The findings and recommendations issued on March 15, 2018 (Doc. No. 9) are

4
5
6
7

adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff’s request for preliminary injunctive relief is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 21, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2