Harris v. Sexton, et al.

Filing 35

ORDER LIFTING STAY of Proceedings; ORDER VACATING March 26, 2019 Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/8/2019. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EARNEST S. HARRIS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. SEXON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ORDER LIFTING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS ORDER VACATING MARCH 26, 2019 SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s conditions of confinement claim against Defendants Sexton, 19 20 Case No.: 1:18-cv-00080-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff Earnest S. Harris is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Aguirre, Stewart, Lambert, Gutierrez, L. Cellobos, and I. Ramirez. On December 21, 2018, the Court identified this case as an appropriate case for the post- 21 22 screening ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) project, and stayed the action to allow the parties an 23 opportunity to settle their dispute before the discovery process begins. (ECF No. 33.) The Court’s 24 order granted Defendants time to investigate and determine whether to opt out of the post-screening 25 ADR project. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 On January 7, 2019, Defendants filed a notice to opt out of the early settlement conference. 1 2 (ECF No. 34.) After reviewing the request, the Court finds good cause to grant Defendants’ request. 3 Therefore, the stay is lifted, and the March 26, 2019, settlement conference is vacated. This case is 4 now ready to proceed, and the discovery and scheduling order will issue by way of separate order. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The stay of this action (ECF No. 33) is LIFTED; and 7 2. The March 26, 2019, settlement conference is VACATED. 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 8, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?