Harris v. Sexton, et al.

Filing 92

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 05/09/22 GRANTING 91 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff shall file any objections to the findings and recommendations, within 30 days of the date of this order.(Licea Chavez, V)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

EARNEST S. HARRIS,

12

No. 1:18-cv-0080 KJM DB P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

SEXTON, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

17
18

Plaintiff alleges defendants’ use of the Guard One security system violated his Eighth

19

Amendment rights. On March 31, 2022, this court recommended: (1) that plaintiff’s motion to

20

amend the second amended complaint be granted in part and denied in part, (2) that defendant’s

21

motion to strike be granted, and (3) that defendant Sexton be dismissed from this case. Plaintiff

22

was given thirty days to file objections to this court’s findings and recommendations. Plaintiff

23

seeks an extension of time to do so.

24

////

25

////

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for an

2

extension of time (ECF No. 91) is granted. Within thirty days of the date of this order, plaintiff

3

shall file any objections to the March 31 findings and recommendations.

4

Dated: May 9, 2022

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

DLB:9
DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/harr0080.obj eot

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2