Gann v. Kokor et al

Filing 7

ORDER DIRECTING Defendants to File Response to Plaintiff's Notice of Objection to Removal of Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/26/18. Twenty-One Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

NATHANIEL MARCUS GANN,

8

Plaintiff,

9
10

v.
KOKOR, et al,

11

Case No. 1:18-cv-00084-BAM (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO
FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE
OF OBJECTION TO REMOVAL OF ACTION
(ECF Nos. 5, 6)

Defendants.

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

12
Plaintiff Nathaniel Marcus Gann (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this

13
14

civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action in Kings County

15

Superior Court on August 16, 2017. On January 16, 2018, Defendants Cryer, Enenmoh, Kokor,

16

and Lewis (collectively “Defendants”) removed the action and requested that the Court screen the

17

complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and that Defendants be allowed thirty days from the

18

screening of the complaint to file a responsive pleading. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff filed an objection

19

to the removal on January 25, 2018, which the Court construes as a motion to remand. (ECF Nos.

20

5, 6.)

21

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file a response to Plaintiff’s

22

motion to remand within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order. Plaintiff’s

23

reply, if any, shall be filed within seven (7) days from the date of service of a response.

24
25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Barbara

January 26, 2018

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1