United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Laurelwood Oak Investors

Filing 5

ORDER Reassigning Case to Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston; new case number 1:18-cv-00088-DAD-JLT, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/22/2018. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 UNITED AFRICAN-ASIAN ABILITIES CLUB, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-00088-DAD-SAB New Case No. 1:18-cv-00088-DAD-JLT 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. ORDER REASSIGNING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JENNIFER L. THURSTON 13 LAURELWOOD OAK INVESTORS, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff filed the complaint in this action on January 19, 2018. Pursuant to the Local Rules all civil actions where the defendants reside in Inyo and Kern counties shall be directly assigned to the Magistrate Judge sitting in Bakersfield. See Appendix A(l)(4). Upon review of the complaint in this action, it appears to the undersigned, the magistrate judge to whom this case is presently assigned, that this case should be assigned to the magistrate judge sitting in Bakersfield, California. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. 24 25 26 27 28 This case shall be reassigned to the docket of United States Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston by the Clerk’s Office; 2. The new case number shall be: 1: 18-cv-00088-DAD-JLT and all future pleadings and/or correspondence must be so numbered. The parties 1 are advised that use of an incorrect case number, including initials, may result in a 2 delay of documents being processed and copies thereof being correctly distributed 3 and received by the appropriate judicial officer; 3. 4 The scheduling conference set for April 17, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9 before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone is vacated. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: January 22, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?