Rhoden v. Department of State Hospitals et al
Filing
27
ORDER Adopting 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; DENYING Plaintiff's Motions for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/8/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LAWTIS DONALD RHODEN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS,
et al.,
Defendants.
16
Case No.: 1:18-cv-00101-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER AND/OR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
[ECF Nos. 3, 8, 10, 17, 22]
Plaintiff Lawtis Donald Rhoden is a civil detainee appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
19
On February 13, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation
20
recommending denial of Plaintiff’s motions for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary
21
injunction. The Findings and Recommendation were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that
22
objections were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed objections on March 1, 2018.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de
24
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and
25
Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The Findings and Recommendation, filed on February 13, 2018, is adopted in full; and
3
2.
Plaintiff’s motions for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction are
4
denied.
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____
March 8, 2018
UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?