Rhoden v. Department of State Hospitals et al

Filing 27

ORDER Adopting 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; DENYING Plaintiff's Motions for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/8/2018. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LAWTIS DONALD RHODEN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS,
et al.,
Defendants.

16

Case No.: 1:18-cv-00101-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER AND/OR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
[ECF Nos. 3, 8, 10, 17, 22]

Plaintiff Lawtis Donald Rhoden is a civil detainee appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

On February 13, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation

20

recommending denial of Plaintiff’s motions for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary

21

injunction. The Findings and Recommendation were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that

22

objections were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff filed objections on March 1, 2018.

23

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

24

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

25

Recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendation, filed on February 13, 2018, is adopted in full; and

3

2.

Plaintiff’s motions for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction are

4

denied.

5
6
7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

March 8, 2018

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2