Rhoden v. Department of State Hospitals et al

Filing 53

ORDER extending the Amended Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendant, Stephen Eggen signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/13/2019. (Lundstrom, T)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAWTIS DONALD RHODEN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS, et al., Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:18-cv-00101-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER EXTENDING THE AMENDED DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER TO DEFENDANT STEPHEN HEGGEN Plaintiff Lawtis Donald Rhoden is a civil detainee appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants Pam Ahlin and Brandon Price for due process 19 20 violation and against Defendants Brandon Price and Stephanie Heggen for denial of free exercise of 21 religion. On March 4, 2019, the Court issued an amended discovery and scheduling order. (ECF No. 22 49.) On March 12, 2019, Defendant Stephanie Heggen filed a timely answer to the complaint. 23 Heggen. (ECF No. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Inasmuch as Defendant Stephanie Heggen, filed an answer to the complaint after the issuance 2 of the amended discovery and scheduling order, it is hereby extended and made applicable Defendant 3 Heggen. Further, all provisions set forth therein remain in full force and effect. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 7 March 13, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?