Rhoden v. Department of State Hospitals et al

Filing 58

ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 57 Motion to Supplement the Complaint with Legal Authority, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/23/19. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAWTIS DONALD RHODEN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS, et al., Defendants. 16 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE COMPLAINT WITH LEGAL AUTHORITY [ECF No. 57] this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file supplemental legal authority in 19 20 Case No.: 1:18-cv-00101-LJO-SAB (PC) Plaintiff Lawtis Donald Rhoden is a civil detainee appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) support of his complaint, filed April 22, 2019. On January 22, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint to add 21 22 Defendant Stefanie Heggen as a Defendant and to add a fourth cause of action for a violation of his 23 right to practice his religion in violation of the First Amendment. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Plaintiff does not provide any supplemental legal authority and it is not clear why he feels he 2 needs to do so in light of the fact that the Court allowed him to amend the complaint and add a claim 3 under the First Amendment. Further, Plaintiff need not cite legal authority to support his claim. 4 Plaintiff’s factual allegations are accepted at true and need not be bolstered by legal authority at the 5 pleading stage. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to supplement the fifth amended complaint with 6 additional legal authority is denied. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: 10 April 23, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?