Rhoden v. Department of State Hospitals et al
Filing
58
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 57 Motion to Supplement the Complaint with Legal Authority, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/23/19. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LAWTIS DONALD RHODEN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS,
et al.,
Defendants.
16
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
SUPPLEMENT THE COMPLAINT WITH LEGAL
AUTHORITY
[ECF No. 57]
this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file supplemental legal authority in
19
20
Case No.: 1:18-cv-00101-LJO-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff Lawtis Donald Rhoden is a civil detainee appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
support of his complaint, filed April 22, 2019.
On January 22, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint to add
21
22
Defendant Stefanie Heggen as a Defendant and to add a fourth cause of action for a violation of his
23
right to practice his religion in violation of the First Amendment.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Plaintiff does not provide any supplemental legal authority and it is not clear why he feels he
2
needs to do so in light of the fact that the Court allowed him to amend the complaint and add a claim
3
under the First Amendment. Further, Plaintiff need not cite legal authority to support his claim.
4
Plaintiff’s factual allegations are accepted at true and need not be bolstered by legal authority at the
5
pleading stage. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to supplement the fifth amended complaint with
6
additional legal authority is denied.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Dated:
10
April 23, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?