Williams v. Price et al

Filing 51

ORDER STRIKING 50 Plaintiff's Surreply, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 03/19/19. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COREY WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:18-cv-00102-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S SURREPLY Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 (ECF No. 50) 14 BRANDON PRICE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Corey Williams, a civil detainee, is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this 18 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 25, 2019, Defendants a motion to 19 dismiss and a request for judicial notice. (ECF Nos. 44, 45.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on 20 February 19, 2019. (ECF No. 46.) Defendants filed a reply on February 26, 2019. (ECF No. 21 48.) 22 Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 49.) On March 18, 2019, Plaintiff filed a surreply. 23 (ECF No. 50.) On March 14, 2019, findings and recommendations issued recommending denying 24 The Local Rules of the Eastern District of California provide for a motion, an opposition, 25 and a reply. L.R. 230(l). Neither the Local Rules nor the Federal Rules provide the right to file 26 a surreply, and the Court neither requested a surreply nor granted a request on the behalf of 27 Plaintiff to file one. 28 /// 1 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s surreply, filed March 18, 2019, is HEREBY STRICKEN from the 1 2 record. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: March 19, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?